State v. Mendoza. No. A-06-080.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2006 Petition for Further Review. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on July 19, 2006.
Category: Court Opinions
STATE v. LANKFORD, 17 Neb. App. 123 (2008)
756 N.W.2d 739 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. JESSE LANKFORD, APPELLANT. No. A-08-460.Nebraska Court of Appeals. Filed October 14, 2008. 1. Judgments: Appeal and Error. When dispositive issues on appeal present questions of law, an appellate court has an obligation to reach an independent conclusion irrespective of the decision of the court below. 2. Sentences: […]
HUSEN v. HUSEN, 241 Neb. 10 (1992)
487 N.W.2d 269 STEVEN L. HUSEN, APPELLEE, v. NANCY K. HUSEN, APPELLANT. No. S-89-1429.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 10, 1992. 1. Contracts. Whether a document is ambiguous is a question of law initially determined by a trial court. 2. Judgments: Appeal and Error. Regarding a question of law, an appellate court has an obligation […]
STATE v. MARTIN, 3 Neb. App. 555 (1995)
529 N.W.2d 545 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE v. JOHN MARTIN, APPELLANT. No. A-94-504.Nebraska Court of Appeals. Filed March 14, 1995. 1. Judgments: Appeal and Error. On questions of law, an appellate court has an obligation to reach a conclusion independent of that of the trial court in a judgment under review. 2. Statutes: Words and […]
STATE v. TART, 12 Neb. App. xcvii (2004)
STATE v. TART. No. A-03-282.Nebraska Court of Appeals. April 21, 2004. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on April 21, 2004.
WEEKLY PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW, 11 Neb. App. lxxviii (2003)
Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2003 No. A-01-522: State v. Pestka. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on May 8, 2002. No. A-01-539: Luedtke v. Ripa. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on November 14, 2002. Nos. A-01-554, A-01-555: Saunders Cty. v. Metropolitan Utilities Dist.-A, 11 Neb. App. 138 (2002). Petitions of appellant for […]
JOLLY v. STATE, 252 Neb. 289 (1997)
562 N.W.2d 61 BONNIE JOLLY AND NEBRASKA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 61, OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA ET AL., APPELLEES. No. S-95-385.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed April 18, 1997. 1. Administrative Law: Courts: Statutes. A court or commission which is of statutory construction has […]
McCREADY v. AL EIGHMY DODGE, 197 Neb. 684 (1977)
250 N.W.2d 640 DELLA J. McCREADY, AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD C. McCREADY, DECEASED, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. AL EIGHMY DODGE, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. No. 40604.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed February 23, 1977. Attorneys at Law: Instructions: Courts: Trial: Appeal and Error. Noncompliance by counsel with the requirement that he […]
HAMMEL v. TRANSIT AUTH. OF CITY OF OMAHA, 235 Neb. 702 (1990)
457 N.W.2d 274 DEAN EARL HAMMEL, APPELLANT v. TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF OMAHA, DOING BUSINESS AS METRO AREA TRANSIT, APPELLEE. No. 88-831.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 6, 1990. Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County, DONALD J. HAMILTON, Judge, upon the recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, WARREN, […]
FUTURE MOTELS, INC. v. CUSTER CTY. BD. OF EQUAL., 252 Neb. 565 (1997)
563 N.W.2d 785 FUTURE MOTELS, INC., A NEBRASKA CORPORATION, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CUSTER COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. No. S-95-882.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed May 30, 1997. 1. Taxation: Valuation: Proof: Appeal and Error. In a taxpayer’s appeal from an action of a county board of equalization, the burden is on the […]