WELTON v. STATE, 171 Neb. 643 (1961)

107 N.W.2d 394 MORGAN D. WELTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. No. 34810.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed February 3, 1961. 1. Criminal Law: Evidence. It is permissible for a party to ask his own witness whether he made prior statements inconsistent with his testimony and such an inquiry is not […]

Read More

STATE v. BRANCH, 277 Neb. 738 (2009)

764 N.W.2d 867 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. JAMES L. BRANCH, APPELLANT. No. S-08-781.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed May 8, 2009. 1. Criminal Law: Convictions: Evidence: Appeal and Error. When reviewing a criminal conviction for sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, the relevant question for an appellate court is whether, after viewing the […]

Read More

WEEKLY CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT OPINION, 8 Neb. App. xlix (1999)

Nebraska Court of Appeals. 1999 No. A-99-306: State v. Krogh. Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal sustained; appeal dismissed. No. A-99-315: Peterson v. Memorial Hosp. of Dodge Cty. Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal sustained; appeal dismissed. No. A-99-318: State v. Borchert. Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal sustained; appeal dismissed. Nos. A-99-319, A-99-343: State […]

Read More

KETTELER v. DANIEL, 251 Neb. 287 (1996)

556 N.W.2d 623 MARILYN A. KETTELER, APPELLANT, v. CARL J. DANIEL, APPELLEE. No. S-94-990.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed December 13, 1996. 1. Trial: Expert Witnesses. The trial court initially determines whether expert testimony will assist the trier of fact. 2. ___: ___. The decision of whether expert testimony will assist the trier of fact depends […]

Read More

STATE v. ARP, 188 Neb. 493 (1972)

197 N.W.2d 703 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. KENNETH DUANE ARP, APPELLANT. No. 38362.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed May 19, 1972. Criminal Law: Sentences: Appeal and Error. A sentence within the limits prescribed by statute will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Appeal from the district court for Howard County: […]

Read More

PETRACEK v. HAAS O.K. RUBBER WELDERS, INC., 176 Neb. 438 (1964)

126 N.W.2d 466 LUMIR PETRACEK, APPELLEE, v. HAAS O.K. RUBBER WELDERS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT. No. 35561.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed February 21, 1964. 1. Trial: Evidence. The burden of establishing a cause of action by circumstantial evidence requires that such evidence, to be sufficient to sustain a verdict or require submission of a case […]

Read More