100 N.W.2d 542 FREDRICK P. WEGNER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LOYD WEST, APPELLEE. No. 34661.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed January 8, 1960. 1. Appeal and Error. In an action in equity it is the duty of this court to try it de novo on the record and to reach thereon an independent conclusion. Page 547 […]
Category: Court Opinions
STATE v. BEANS, 212 Neb. 31 (1982)
321 N.W.2d 72 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. LEE A. BEANS, APPELLANT. No. 81-622.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed June 25, 1982. 1. Pleas: Mental Competency. The question of whether or not a defendant is competent to stand trial or to enter a plea is one of fact to be determined by the trial court and […]
PICK v. NELSON, 247 Neb. 487 (1995)
528 N.W.2d 309 GUS PICK AND WM. D. DENDINGER, APPELLANTS, v. E. BENJAMIN NELSON, GOVERNOR OF NEBRASKA, ET AL., APPELLEES. No. S-94-014.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed March 3, 1995. 1. Constitutional Law: Declaratory Judgments: Statutes. An action to declare a statute unconstitutional is more akin to relief through an equity action than to relief through […]
IN RE CASEY, 14 Neb. App. lxxxvii (2006)
In re Interest of Casey S. et al. No. A-05-1177.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2006 Petition for Further Review. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on June 7, 2006.
STATE v. ANDERSON, 12 Neb. App. lxix (2004)
STATE v. ANDERSON. Nos. A-04-215, A-04-216.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motions of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgments affirmed. See, rule 7B(2); State v. Decker, 261 Neb. 382, 622 N.W.2d 903 (2001); State v. Harrison, 255 Neb. 990, 588 N.W.2d 556 (1999).
KEUP v. DEPARTMENT OF CORN SERVS, 272 Neb. xxxiii (2007)
Keup v. Department of Corn Servs. No. A-06-366.Supreme Court of Nebraska. 2007. List of Cases On Petition For Further Review Petition of appellant for further review overruled on July 19, 2006.
CARROLL v. MOORE, 228 Neb. 561 (1988)
423 N.W.2d 757 MARCIA LEE CARROLL, APPELLEE, v. EDWIN CHARLES MOORE, APPELLANT. No. 86-375.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed May 20, 1988. 1. Constitutional Law: Due Process. Due process requires, at a minimum, that absent a countervailing state interest of overriding significance, persons forced to settle their claims of right and duty through the judicial process […]
STATE v. BUSSART, 14 Neb. App. lv (2006)
State v. Bussart. No. A-05-1414.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2006 Cases Disposed of Without Opinion. Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See, rule 7B(2); State v. Decker, 261 Neb. 382, 622 N.W.2d 903 (2001) State v. Harrison, 255 Neb. 990, 588 N.W.2d 556 (1999); State v. Cody, 248 Neb. 683, 539 N.W.2d 18 […]
STATE v. JIM, 278 Neb. 238 (2009)
768 N.W.2d 464 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. RICKEY L. JIM, APPELLANT. No. S-08-953.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 31, 2009. 1. Postconviction: Proof: Appeal and Error. A defendant requesting postconviction relief must establish the basis for such relief, and the district court’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Page 239 […]
DUFF v. STATE, 12 Neb. App. cv (2004)
DUFF v. STATE. No. A-03-1469.Nebraska Court of Appeals. September 1, 2004. Petition of appellant for further review overruled on September 1, 2004.