738 N.W.2d 840 KEVIN M. JONES AND AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A WISCONSIN CORPORATION, APPELLANTS, v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, APPELLEE. No. S-06-310.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed August 24, 2007. 1. Insurance: Contracts: Appeal and Error. The interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law, in connection with which an appellate court […]
Category: Court Opinions
KEITH v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, 205 Neb. 631 (1980)
289 N.W.2d 196 FRED A. KEITH, APPELLANT, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF NORTH PLATTE, NEBRASKA, AND THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES. No. 42694.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed February 26, 1980. 1. Workmen’s Compensation: Judgments: Verdicts. Findings of fact made by the Workmen’s Compensation Court after rehearing have the effect of a jury […]
IN RE INTEREST OF MASON T., 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
IN RE INTEREST OF MASON T. No. A-03-878.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Appeal dismissed. See, rule 7A(2); In re Interest of Clifford M. et al., 258 Neb. 800, 606 N.W.2d 743 (2000).
STATE v. GERDES, 233 Neb. 528 (1989)
446 N.W.2d 224 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. KEVIN D. GERDES, APPELLANT. No. 88-973.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed September 29, 1989. 1. Judgments: Collateral Estoppel. The doctrine of collateral estoppel means that when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, the issue cannot again be litigated between […]
STATE v. SWOOPES, 223 Neb. 914 (1986)
395 N.W.2d 500 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. ROBERT D. SWOOPES, APPELLANT. No. 85-924.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed October 24, 1986. 1. Criminal Law: Identification Procedures. An array of five photographs is sufficient to constitute a fair and adequate array when attempting to identify a single perpetrator. 2. ___. ___. The determination as to whether […]
HEHN v. STATE, 206 Neb. 34 (1980)
290 N.W.2d 813 ARTHUR HEHN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, AND DOROTHY C. RYAN, OFFICE SUPERVISOR, APPELLEES. No. 42702.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed April 8, 1980. 1. Administrative Hearings: Appeal and Error: Record: Revocation. Upon a petition for review of an order of suspension of an operator’s license by the director […]
STATE v. OBST, 12 Neb. App. xc (2003)
STATE v. OBST. Nos. A-02-764, A-02-1297, A-02-1298.Nebraska Court of Appeals. December 10, 2003. 12 Neb. App. 189 (2003). Petitions of appellants for further review overruled on December 10, 2003.
DANIELSEN v. RICHARDS MFG. CO., INC., 206 Neb. 676 (1980)
294 N.W.2d 858 DOROTHY H. DANIELSEN, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RICHARDS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, AND MISDOM-FRANK CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 42840.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed July 15, 1980. 1. Circumstantial Evidence. Plaintiff may establish its case by circumstantial evidence as well as by direct evidence, yet circumstantial evidence is not sufficient […]
BALIULIS v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, 204 Neb. 739 (1979)
285 N.W.2d 227 ALDONA BALIULIS, APPELLANT, v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, APPELLEE. No. 42444.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed November 13, 1979. 1. Workmen’s Compensation: Evidence: Judgment. The findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court on rehearing have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case, and will not […]
PATTON v. PATTON, 203 Neb. 638 (1979)
279 N.W.2d 627 GUY R. PATTON, APPELLEE, v. ELIZABETH A. PATTON, APPELLANT. No. 42271.Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed June 5, 1979. 1. Divorce: Appeal and Error: Witnesses. In an appeal of an action for dissolution of a marriage, the Supreme Court is required to try the case de novo and reach independent conclusions on the […]