Categories: Court Opinions

STATE v. BODEN, 199 Neb. 423 (1977)

259 N.W.2d 32

STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. EMMIT BODEN, APPELLANT.

No. 41509.Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Filed November 9, 1977.

Sentences: Probation and Parole. An order or sentence of the trial court which denies probation will not be overturned on appeal unless there has been an abuse of discretion.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: WILLIAM C. HASTINGS, Judge. Affirmed.

T. Clement Gaughan and Toney J. Redman, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Terry R. Schaaf, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY, and WHITE, JJ.

WHITE, C. J.

The defendant was charged with petit larceny, second offense. Pursuant to a plea bargain, in which another petit larceny charge was dismissed, the defendant pled guilty. The District Court sentenced the defendant to a term of 1 year imprisonment in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex with credit given for 84 days jail time.

The defendant appeals, contending that his sentence was excessive. He argues that he should have received probation. An order or sentence of the trial court which denies probation will not be overturned on appeal unless there has been an abuse of discretion. State v. Swails, 195 Neb. 406, 238 N.W.2d 246 (1976).

The presentence investigation report shows that the defendant was, previously to this offense, convicted of disturbing the peace, petit larceny, trespass, carrying a concealed weapon, and in possession of stolen goods. It is apparent that the defendant’s previous encounters with the law have failed to

Page 424

impress upon him the serious nature of his conduct. It certainly was no abuse of discretion for the trial court to conclude that a period of incarceration might accomplish this. The defendant received the minimum sentence under section 28-512, R.R.S. 1943. A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. We find no abuse of discretion here.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court are correct and are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

SINU v. CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY, 313 Neb. 218 (2023)

313 Neb. 218 KONRAD SINU AND LIDIA SZURLEJ, Appellants, v. CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY, Appellee. No. S-21-959.Supreme…

3 years ago

ROBEEN v. STATE, 144 Neb. 910 (1944)

144 Neb. 910 Supreme Court of Nebraska. ROBEEN v. STATE. No. 31800. June 30, 1944.…

7 years ago

WINTER v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, 257 Neb. 28 (1999)

594 N.W.2d 642 MATTHEW R. WINTER, APPELLEE, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLANT. No. S-98-704.Supreme…

7 years ago

BRUNO v. GUNNISON CONTRACTORS, INC., 176 Neb. 462 (1964)

126 N.W.2d 477 JOHN BRUNO, APPELLEE, v. GUNNISON CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 35540.Supreme…

7 years ago

CUMULATIVE CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT OPINION, 212 Neb. xxx (1982)

Supreme Court of Nebraska. CUMULATIVE LIST OF CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT OPINION No. 82-398: State…

7 years ago

CARPENTER v. BENDORF, 246 Neb. 77 (1994)

516 N.W.2d 619 ANNETTE CARPENDER AND JACK CARPENDER, APPELLANTS, v. RICHARD BENDORF, APPELLEE. No. S-92-375.Supreme…

7 years ago