No. S-03-635.Supreme Court of Nebraska.
2006.
Appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is denied. However, based upon appellant’s representation in his written objection to such motion that in this postconviction action, he is alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in a prior postconviction appeal, the court determines on its own motion that no error of law appears and that a detailed opinion would have no precedential value. See, State v. Dandridge, 264 Neb. 707, 651 N.W.2d 567 (2002), and State v. Hunt, 262 Neb. 648, 634 N.W.2d 475 (2001) (holding that there is no constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel in postconviction action); State v. Loner, 266 Neb. 245, 664 N.W.2d 892 (2003) (holding that for postconviction relief to be granted under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§29-3001 to 29-3004 (Reissue 1995), claimed infringement must be constitutional in dimension). Affirmed. See rule 7A(1).
Page xxii
313 Neb. 218 KONRAD SINU AND LIDIA SZURLEJ, Appellants, v. CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY, Appellee. No. S-21-959.Supreme…
144 Neb. 910 Supreme Court of Nebraska. ROBEEN v. STATE. No. 31800. June 30, 1944.…
594 N.W.2d 642 MATTHEW R. WINTER, APPELLEE, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLANT. No. S-98-704.Supreme…
126 N.W.2d 477 JOHN BRUNO, APPELLEE, v. GUNNISON CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 35540.Supreme…
Supreme Court of Nebraska. CUMULATIVE LIST OF CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT OPINION No. 82-398: State…
516 N.W.2d 619 ANNETTE CARPENDER AND JACK CARPENDER, APPELLANTS, v. RICHARD BENDORF, APPELLEE. No. S-92-375.Supreme…