SPRUNGER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORR. SERVS. No. A-03-866.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal for mootness sustained; appeal dismissed.
Articles Tagged: 12 Neb. App. xxxix
STATE v. DAVLIN, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
STATE v. DAVLIN. No. A-03-871.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See State v. Becerra, 263 Neb. 753, 642 N.W.2d 143 (2002).
HARRIS v. OMAHA HOUS. AUTH., 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
HARRIS v. OMAHA HOUS. AUTH. No. A-03-881.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Appeal dismissed. See, rule 7A(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1315 (Cum. Supp. 2002); Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. City of Lincoln, 260 Neb. 372, 617 N.W.2d 806 (2000).
STATE v. SANDERS, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
STATE v. SANDERS. No. A-03-875.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See rule 7B(2).
STATE v. BARKER, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
STATE v. BARKER. No. A-03-884.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See rule 7B(2).
WIENS v. WIENS, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
WIENS v. WIENS. No. A-03-886.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal sustained; appeal dismissed.
STATE v. CHRISTIANSEN, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
STATE v. CHRISTIANSEN. No. A-03-885.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See rule 7B(2).
IN RE INTEREST OF CARLSON, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
IN RE INTEREST OF CARLSON. No. A-03-887.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellant to dismiss appeal sustained; appeal dismissed. Page xl
THURSTON v. THURSTON, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
THURSTON v. THURSTON. No. A-03-876.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Stipulation allowed; appeal dismissed; each party to pay own costs.
MUMIN v. LEDUC, 12 Neb. App. xxxix (2004)
MUMIN v. LEDUC. No. A-03-865.Nebraska Court of Appeals. 2004 Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed. See, State v. Dunster, 262 Neb. 329, 631 N.W.2d 879 (2001) State v. Biernacki, 237 Neb. 215, 465 N.W.2d 732 (1991) (party appealing has burden of presenting record which supports assignment of error).